105 | Thoughts on Lab Testing
In the Clinic with Camille
105 | Thoughts on Lab Testing
Spotify podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Podcast Addict podcast player badge
PocketCasts podcast player badge
Podchaser podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player iconApple Podcasts podcast player iconPodcast Addict podcast player iconPocketCasts podcast player iconPodchaser podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

This week, I explain how herbalists can responsibly discuss conventional labs with clients. We'll go over my thoughts on what’s useful, how to stay within scope, and when to recommend primary care or direct-to-consumer options like GoodLabs.

It's important to consider accurate documentation, financial implications, and practical steps for requesting or reviewing labs without interpreting results as a medical diagnosis if you decide to work with labs in your practice.

If you have a question you'd like me to answer in a future podcast, please reach out via In the Clinic or my website.

Thanks for listening.

I'd love to hear from you. Leave me a voicemail with feedback or submit a question (click the pink "Send Camille a Message" button on the side of the page) 💚

Camille's Helpful Links for Practitioners

00:03 - Welcome to In the Clinic

01:18 - Navigating Lab Work in Herbal Practice

04:19 - Discussing Lab Results with Clients

05:30 - Recommendations for Additional Labs

08:54 - Exploring Direct-to-Consumer Lab Options

09:59 - Conclusion and Future Topics

WEBVTT

00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:03.357
Hi there. Welcome to In the Clinic with Camille. My name is Camille Freeman.

00:00:03.537 --> 00:00:04.937
I'm an herbalist and nutritionist.

00:00:05.317 --> 00:00:09.277
And in this podcast, I share little tips and tidbits that might be helpful for other practitioners.

00:00:10.017 --> 00:00:11.537
Today, I wanted to answer a question

00:00:11.537 --> 00:00:14.697
that came in in response to one of my practitioner notes newsletters.

00:00:15.077 --> 00:00:18.017
As a side note, if you would like to receive these in your inbox,

00:00:18.197 --> 00:00:20.357
you can just go to my website, camillefreeman.com.

00:00:20.457 --> 00:00:24.017
There's a sign up for my newsletter on pretty much every page of the website.

00:00:24.017 --> 00:00:28.937
So in this newsletter, I have a recommendations section, and each week I recommend

00:00:28.937 --> 00:00:33.137
three things that I found interesting, delightful, tasty, what have you.

00:00:33.317 --> 00:00:36.937
And in this particular newsletter, I had recommended a service called GoodLabs,

00:00:37.177 --> 00:00:40.217
which is direct-to-consumer lab testing.

00:00:40.877 --> 00:00:45.437
You can, you know, pay a pretty nominal amount and go in and get various labs

00:00:45.437 --> 00:00:51.017
and regular Quest centers, and then they will send you the results.

00:00:51.557 --> 00:00:57.277
As a side note, this lab also offers for people in certain areas some free basic

00:00:57.277 --> 00:00:59.277
labs when you donate blood, which is kind of cool.

00:01:01.164 --> 00:01:05.064
Anyway, I received a question following that newsletter, and here is the question.

00:01:05.284 --> 00:01:08.104
It says, your recommendation of good labs brought up a question for me.

00:01:08.204 --> 00:01:11.624
I'm an advanced clinical herbalism student just starting to put pieces in place

00:01:11.624 --> 00:01:16.544
to begin practice with real people in the real world, and my maybe basic question is this.

00:01:17.044 --> 00:01:19.884
I'm learning about functional blood work in a couple different schools right

00:01:19.884 --> 00:01:23.624
now, but since we as herbalists are unlicensed and must be mindful about how

00:01:23.624 --> 00:01:26.964
we communicate with clients, so as not to practice medicine without a license,

00:01:27.184 --> 00:01:29.144
how do you work with clients around labs?

00:01:29.144 --> 00:01:32.764
Outside of using lab results to inform a protocol, do you ever discuss labs

00:01:32.764 --> 00:01:35.084
with a client or is this outside of an herbalist scope?

00:01:35.424 --> 00:01:39.444
If the client isn't working with a GP, would recommending that they go get some

00:01:39.444 --> 00:01:43.044
labs B outside of our scope? So these are really great questions.

00:01:43.564 --> 00:01:48.084
And I certainly want to mention that I am not a health care lawyer.

00:01:48.404 --> 00:01:52.524
This is not my area of expertise. I will just share with you how I have approached

00:01:52.524 --> 00:01:55.524
this as somebody who's been in practice for a while.

00:01:56.224 --> 00:02:01.424
So first of all, I think that labs are really valuable, and they certainly provide

00:02:01.424 --> 00:02:04.944
some important context that we aren't able to get in other ways.

00:02:05.264 --> 00:02:11.604
And you do start to veer into territory that is outside of our scope if you

00:02:11.604 --> 00:02:19.124
get into interpreting labs or implying any sort of diagnosis or treatment associated with the labs.

00:02:19.584 --> 00:02:23.904
So we want to provide the best care that we can, but we also want to make sure

00:02:23.904 --> 00:02:27.384
that we are staying safe, we are staying ethical, we are being legal in the

00:02:27.384 --> 00:02:29.644
way that we're doing the work we're trained to do.

00:02:29.804 --> 00:02:33.344
So my approach to this is generally that I find...

00:02:34.166 --> 00:02:41.946
Basic labs such as lipid panels, thyroid, ferritin, iron screening,

00:02:42.366 --> 00:02:45.226
these types of things, I find that they can be really helpful.

00:02:45.226 --> 00:02:50.126
And if somebody hasn't had them in a while, I do think it's worth keeping an

00:02:50.126 --> 00:02:53.806
eye on many of these things, especially if they have some symptoms and they

00:02:53.806 --> 00:02:58.466
haven't been given a reasonable explanation for those symptoms that are continuing on.

00:02:58.626 --> 00:03:02.886
I think it can be worth investigating to find out more about what's going on.

00:03:02.886 --> 00:03:07.086
I'm going to do a whole separate podcast episode at some point in the future

00:03:07.086 --> 00:03:11.886
about some of the kind of functional labs and those types of testing.

00:03:11.986 --> 00:03:15.366
But what I'm talking about today is just our kind of basic conventional labs

00:03:15.366 --> 00:03:19.306
that you might get at the doctor's office, either as part of a regular screening

00:03:19.306 --> 00:03:23.606
or if they are trying to diagnose or investigate further something that's going

00:03:23.606 --> 00:03:26.286
on with somebody. All right. So let's just say we're sticking with those for today.

00:03:26.686 --> 00:03:29.486
So if somebody has those, I would like to see them.

00:03:30.126 --> 00:03:33.806
Usually they are, it's just confirming. But what I find is that sometimes when

00:03:33.806 --> 00:03:38.706
people say their numbers by recall, it's not actually the same as what's on the labs.

00:03:38.866 --> 00:03:42.606
Not that I think people are intentionally lying or misleading me,

00:03:42.686 --> 00:03:44.686
but just, you know, these numbers are hard to remember.

00:03:45.086 --> 00:03:48.106
And it's good to double check because sometimes what people remember as the

00:03:48.106 --> 00:03:49.726
numbers is not what the actual numbers show.

00:03:49.986 --> 00:03:52.986
Or sometimes you get additional information about, well, this is what it is now.

00:03:53.086 --> 00:03:56.846
But the history of the numbers is a little bit different. and it gives us some

00:03:56.846 --> 00:03:59.806
important context about where we are now and where things are going.

00:04:00.326 --> 00:04:03.266
Okay, so I think it's useful to see them. So if somebody has them,

00:04:03.426 --> 00:04:05.606
I do say, hey, I'd love to see them.

00:04:05.906 --> 00:04:09.986
I work through Practice Better so they can upload them in a secure environment.

00:04:10.186 --> 00:04:13.886
I can take a look. I make a note of them and we go from there.

00:04:14.406 --> 00:04:17.486
The question beyond that, though, is how do we.

00:04:18.215 --> 00:04:21.635
How do we think about working with those labs and how do we think about the

00:04:21.635 --> 00:04:27.415
talking about the labs and or requesting additional labs if we think they might be needed.

00:04:27.735 --> 00:04:32.335
So generally speaking, I very rarely am going to say to a client,

00:04:32.535 --> 00:04:36.455
oh wow, you know, your thyroid numbers are borderline, so we're going to do

00:04:36.455 --> 00:04:39.015
a bunch of work on your thyroid and see if we can get those numbers back up.

00:04:39.215 --> 00:04:42.035
First of all, that is practicing in a different model than I use.

00:04:42.195 --> 00:04:45.675
I'm not, again, And it implies that we are treating their thyroid,

00:04:45.915 --> 00:04:47.355
which is not really how I work.

00:04:47.455 --> 00:04:51.935
My model is that I am supporting the overall health of the person with the idea

00:04:51.935 --> 00:04:55.375
that the body will then and can then return to.

00:04:56.267 --> 00:04:59.807
Balance or return as much to center as it can based on what we're doing.

00:05:00.287 --> 00:05:05.567
So I would never say something like that. I can sometimes mention to people

00:05:05.567 --> 00:05:09.367
like, hey, you know, you're doing all of this work to include whatever they're

00:05:09.367 --> 00:05:13.667
doing with their conventional, you know, their doctor, their primary care, the herbs, etc.

00:05:13.727 --> 00:05:18.007
It's usually great to retest every three to six months. But I'm not implying

00:05:18.007 --> 00:05:20.367
that we need that to know if what we're doing is working.

00:05:20.567 --> 00:05:22.727
Because again, And I consider that outside of my scope.

00:05:23.107 --> 00:05:28.667
When it comes to how do I think about requesting a lab, this will happen sometimes

00:05:28.667 --> 00:05:34.987
if a client's primary care or whoever they're working with is reluctant to order

00:05:34.987 --> 00:05:37.447
specific labs for various reasons.

00:05:37.567 --> 00:05:40.107
I have, you know, sometimes I think they're pretty legit and it's like,

00:05:40.187 --> 00:05:45.007
oh, this seems like perhaps excessive or maybe wasteful testing that isn't really needed.

00:05:45.527 --> 00:05:49.227
Or sometimes they're just, I don't know, they feel like their authority has

00:05:49.227 --> 00:05:51.847
been challenged by the client or a different practitioner and they just don't

00:05:51.847 --> 00:05:53.127
want to order it for whatever reason.

00:05:53.307 --> 00:05:58.207
They have a different philosophy on what's happening, etc. I've seen this before with things like iron.

00:05:58.707 --> 00:06:01.567
You know, if somebody's had their hemoglobin and hematocrit done,

00:06:01.687 --> 00:06:03.367
then they're like, well, we don't need to look at ferritin.

00:06:03.807 --> 00:06:06.887
Sometimes people are reluctant to look at anything beyond TSH,

00:06:07.267 --> 00:06:11.607
which I understand, but at times it may make sense to dig a little bit deeper.

00:06:12.087 --> 00:06:16.147
Sometimes people want lipid panels at a more frequent schedule than they are

00:06:16.147 --> 00:06:18.467
offered through primary care, whatever it is.

00:06:18.827 --> 00:06:23.427
So if I think that some additional lab testing might be helpful,

00:06:23.807 --> 00:06:27.027
the very first step I'm going to take is I'm going to say, hey,

00:06:27.207 --> 00:06:31.747
the next time you're going into your primary care, you might want to see if

00:06:31.747 --> 00:06:35.127
they are willing to order these labs for you, and here's why.

00:06:35.347 --> 00:06:38.867
And oftentimes they will or they order a subset of those, and I'm like,

00:06:38.927 --> 00:06:42.427
great, Again, I don't base my practice entirely on these labs,

00:06:42.427 --> 00:06:46.907
and it's not that common that I'm like, I really need this number before we can keep going.

00:06:47.805 --> 00:06:52.005
So first step, say, hey, here's some labs that I think could be helpful.

00:06:52.145 --> 00:06:55.865
Here's why you may want to ask your primary care if they would be willing to order them.

00:06:56.465 --> 00:07:00.345
If the answer is no, or if the person doesn't have a primary care and they really

00:07:00.345 --> 00:07:04.465
want these numbers, I do think it's important to recommend and document in your

00:07:04.465 --> 00:07:06.765
notes that somebody have a primary care if they don't.

00:07:06.865 --> 00:07:10.285
Even if they choose not to get one, at least you have documented that you recommended

00:07:10.285 --> 00:07:14.765
it, which seems less likely if there was a time where you needed to turn over

00:07:14.765 --> 00:07:18.485
your records for any reason. at least it will say in there, I recommended that

00:07:18.485 --> 00:07:20.885
they see primary care. If they didn't, that's their choice.

00:07:21.605 --> 00:07:27.245
So anyway, I will then sometimes say like, hey, you know, there is a self-pay

00:07:27.245 --> 00:07:32.485
option if you wanted to do X, Y, Z. And that's where I might recommend something like GoodLabs.

00:07:32.805 --> 00:07:35.745
Quest Diagnostic does, you know, direct to consumer as well.

00:07:35.825 --> 00:07:39.165
There's a bunch of different options. I'm not saying GoodLabs is the automatic best one.

00:07:39.665 --> 00:07:44.065
Sorry, my dog is here with us. But there's options if you want to pay out of

00:07:44.065 --> 00:07:45.405
pocket and go direct to consumer.

00:07:45.565 --> 00:07:49.325
The other time that I might recommend these types of lab services is if somebody

00:07:49.325 --> 00:07:50.745
has really crappy insurance.

00:07:50.745 --> 00:07:55.085
This is a problem for us here in the United States, but sometimes people have

00:07:55.085 --> 00:08:00.365
very high deductibles and they may not have coverage for these labs or they

00:08:00.365 --> 00:08:04.585
may have limited coverage for even a basic lipid panel or something like that.

00:08:05.105 --> 00:08:10.445
Sometimes it is way cheaper for the person overall to just get it direct through

00:08:10.445 --> 00:08:15.205
one of these other services than it is to pay whatever they're going to be charged

00:08:15.205 --> 00:08:17.325
if they go through their primary care and their insurance.

00:08:17.485 --> 00:08:23.605
So for a financial perspective, it can sometimes be valuable to just do it yourself directly.

00:08:23.965 --> 00:08:29.025
The problem is, of course, that then you don't have integration of your labs,

00:08:29.025 --> 00:08:33.845
and it's going to be your job to send these labs to your various providers.

00:08:33.845 --> 00:08:36.985
It's not going to have gone through MyChart or whatever other,

00:08:36.985 --> 00:08:40.565
you know, EMR your doctor is using, and so it can be a little bit.

00:08:41.369 --> 00:08:44.929
You know, a little bit more of an integration problem. But financially speaking,

00:08:45.109 --> 00:08:48.969
a lot of times it comes out better for the client, even if they have insurance

00:08:48.969 --> 00:08:52.229
and they have a PCP, sometimes it's better to just go through the Goodlaps.

00:08:52.589 --> 00:08:56.789
So if I'm going to say something like that, again, I will say something like,

00:08:56.869 --> 00:08:59.989
hey, I recommend going through your primary care or even Teladoc,

00:09:00.129 --> 00:09:03.349
you know, if they have a Televisits or whatever, sometimes they can order them through there.

00:09:03.789 --> 00:09:08.509
But I'll say usually go through there. However, it's worth looking to see if

00:09:08.509 --> 00:09:11.909
it's more affordable or, you know, if you don't have access to your primary

00:09:11.909 --> 00:09:13.869
care, this is another option for people.

00:09:14.489 --> 00:09:17.569
So I don't necessarily say, I think you need these labs.

00:09:17.709 --> 00:09:20.069
I will say something like, hey, if you wanted to get this lab,

00:09:20.269 --> 00:09:24.489
here is another option that some of my clients have used. Okay.

00:09:25.109 --> 00:09:29.469
So I think that the biggest thing for me is like, I don't want to recommend

00:09:29.469 --> 00:09:34.229
or imply that I would like to see a lab if I don't actually think that it would

00:09:34.229 --> 00:09:36.549
meaningfully change what I'm doing with the client,

00:09:36.549 --> 00:09:41.489
then that I consider that just a waste of their time and their money and also

00:09:41.489 --> 00:09:44.849
implying again that I'm working in a way that I'm not working.

00:09:45.049 --> 00:09:49.589
So I try to be pretty circumspect about how often I'm doing this but there are

00:09:49.589 --> 00:09:53.969
times when a client feels really strongly and or when their you know medical

00:09:53.969 --> 00:09:59.629
care is not adequate that it may be useful to go down one of these routes.

00:09:59.889 --> 00:10:03.809
All right so I hope that's helpful. It provides a little bit of perspective.

00:10:04.489 --> 00:10:07.649
Again, I will do a different episode later on some of the functional tests and

00:10:07.649 --> 00:10:10.309
my opinions about those because they're pretty different and I have some,

00:10:10.529 --> 00:10:15.529
I think, contradictory opinions to what many people think about these types of tests.

00:10:15.749 --> 00:10:18.769
So there you go. Thank you so much for submitting a question.

00:10:18.769 --> 00:10:21.129
If you have a question that you would like to share with me,

00:10:21.189 --> 00:10:24.329
I would love to hear it. I love answering questions on the podcast and elsewhere.

00:10:24.709 --> 00:10:29.609
You can submit a question on intheclinic.com. You can reply to any Practitioner

00:10:29.609 --> 00:10:31.829
Notes newsletter, or you could just email me.

00:10:31.949 --> 00:10:35.389
My contact information is on my website, camillefreeman.com.

00:10:35.849 --> 00:10:38.009
All right, thanks for listening. I hope you have an amazing day,

00:10:38.129 --> 00:10:40.089
and I'll be back soon with another episode.